Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Duty demand and attachment of bank account without opportunity of being heard unjustified: Madras HC

Case Law Details

Case Name
Tvl. Mohanasundaram Senthilvelu Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Tvl. Mohanasundaram Senthilvelu Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that impugned order confirming demand u/s. 73 of the CGST Act and issuing bank attachment notice set aside as order was passed without giving an opportunity of being heard. Accordingly, order held as passed in violation of principles of nature justice. Facts- Vide the present petition, the petitioner alleges that the proceedings initiated u/s. 61 of the CGST Act, 2017, for the Financial Year 2018-2019, resulted in a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 22.12.2021, for excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs.4,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *