Case Law Details
Sunny Jacob Jewellers Gold Hyper Market Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax (Kerala High Court)
The recent judgment by the Kerala High Court addressed critical issues surrounding income tax assessments related to Sunny Jacob Jewellers. The case revolved around the authority of the Assessing Officer (AO) to reopen assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act without incriminating material.
The appeals before the court involved multiple assessment years and focused on whether the AO had sufficient grounds to initiate fresh assessment proceedings under Section 153A. The crux of the matter was the absence of incriminating material pertaining to the assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08, despite a search conducted under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act in 2007.
The AO, relying on the search findings from 2007, attempted to estimate undisclosed income for several assessment years preceding the search period. This estimation was challenged by the appellants, arguing that without specific incriminating evidence for those years, the AO lacked jurisdiction to reassess.
The appellate process saw conflicting decisions: while the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) partly upheld the AO’s actions, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) reversed these decisions, remanding the assessments back to the AO. The ITAT’s rationale included interpreting precedents where incriminating material was found in later periods, extending liability to previous years.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
