Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Jurisdiction assumed by AO at Mumbai invalid as assessee resided and carried profession at Bangalore: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jeeri Keerthana Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Jeeri Keerthana Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that assessee was residing as well as carrying on her profession at Bangalore and thus, assumption of jurisdiction by the AO at Mumbai was invalid. Thus, an order which is passed without jurisdiction is non est in the eyes of law. Facts- The case of the assessee was selected under CASS for limited scrutiny assessment. During the course of the scrutiny, assessee raised an issue about the territorial jurisdiction of AO, namely the Income Tax Officer, Ward 19(2)(4), Mumbai on the ground that the assessee was a resident and was carrying o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *