This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Jurisdiction assumed by AO at Mumbai invalid as assessee resided and carried profession at Bangalore: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jeeri Keerthana Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Jeeri Keerthana Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee was residing as well as carrying on her profession at Bangalore and thus, assumption of jurisdiction by the AO at Mumbai was invalid. Thus, an order which is passed without jurisdiction is non est in the eyes of law.
Facts- The case of the assessee was selected under CASS for limited scrutiny assessment. During the course of the scrutiny, assessee raised an issue about the territorial jurisdiction of AO, namely the Income Tax Officer, Ward 19(2)(4), Mumbai on the ground that the assessee was a resident and was carrying o...





