This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty not warranted as non-reflection of foreign assets in return not malafide
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ocean Diving Centre Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ocean Diving Centre Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under section 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 unwarranted for non-reflection of investment in Schedule of ‘Foreign Assets’ in return as it was not malafide or dishonest breach/ non-disclosure.
Facts-
The Assessee being a domestic company resident in India, having the nature of business as “services”, declared its total income as “NIL” by filing its return of income on 30.11.2016. Subsequently during the course of investigation in the case of Mr...



