This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Allows Appeal Over Delayed Delivery of SAD Refund Sanction Order
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Nitco Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Nitco Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (ITAT Chennai)
Introduction: In the case of Nitco Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chennai has set aside a previous order due to an unjustified delay in serving the Order-in-Original to the assessee, Nitco Limited. Nitco had initially appealed for a refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) but was granted only a partial refund, with the rest denied without proper notification.
Analysis: The dispute involved the delay in delivery of the Order-in-Original to Nitco Limited, detailing the pa...
