Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Raw material supplier cannot be implicated for clandestine removal of goods by buyer

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2023 taxguru.in 2022
Case Name
Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

As regard the appellant M/s. Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia, he is the raw material supplier. The raw material supplier cannot be implicated for clandestine removal of the goods by the buyer of the raw material. Therefore, the penalty on M/s. Dhanjibhai Bhikhabhai Ranparia is not sustainable.

Purchasing Goods without invoice/bill amounts to abatement for evasion of duty – Penalty reduced by CESTAT

As regard other appellants as I discussed above the lapse on their part is that they have purchased goods without proper invoice/bills from M/s. Rainbow Engineering Co therefore, to some extent they are responsible for evasion of duty by M/s. Rainbow Engineering Co. Accordingly, considering the overall facts of the case and the amount of duty involved, I am of the view that the penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh in each appellants is very harsh, therefore, I reduce the penalty from 1 Lakh to 25,000/- each on 4 appellants namely Cosmo Pump, Sai Shereegupta, Gupta Machinery Stores, Geeta Enterprises.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT AHMEDABAD ORDER

In these appeals, the appellants have challenged imposition penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh each on the appellants in connection with a case of clandestine removal by M/s. Rainbow Engineering co., against which the demand of Central Excise Duty of Rs. 8,36,530/- was confirmed. In this case there is an order of confiscation of 26 power driven pumps valued of Rs. 1,12,600/- and for redemption of the same of fine of Rs. 30,000/- was imposed.

2. Shri Rahul Gajera, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the issue involved is that whether the pumps cleared by M/s. Rainbow Engineering Co., is not in conformed to the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), accordingly not eligible for SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003. It is his submission that the condition of notification of BIS certification has no relevance with the present appellants and it is purely question of law which is applicable to M/s. Rainbow Engineering co and for any violation of the notification and wrong availment of Exemption Notification No. 8/2003-CE, the present appellants cannot be penalized. He placed relied upon the following judgments:

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.