Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : KPR Fertilizers Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
KPR Fertilizers Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) CESTAT Hyderabad held that classifying micronutrients manufactured by the appellant, as plant growth regulators, under Chapter heading 38089304 instead of Chapter heading 3105 is unsustainable Facts- The appellant manufactures micronutrients for plants and has classified them under Chapter heading 3105 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. A show cause notice dated 03.2011 was issued to the appellant covering the period 2007-08 to 20010-11 proposing to classify the micronutrients manufactured by t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930