Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bapuji Murugesan Vs Mythili Rajagopalan  (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bapuji Murugesan Vs Mythili Rajagopalan  (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Order for grant of suspension of sentence or bail were all interlocutory orders and were not revisable under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Held: In the instant case, assessee contended that order of deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was mandatory and that the deposit was with respect to 20% of the compensation/fine amount and not the cheque amount. contended that the order was interlocutory and therefore the revision itself was not maintainable. It was held that the court opined...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930