Once jurisdictional seat of arbitration is fixed, same cannot be shifted on appointment of new arbitrator

BBR (India) Private Limited Vs S.P. Singla Constructions Private Limited (Supreme Court of India) Facts- The short and interesting issue which arises in the present appeals is – whether conducting the arbitration proceedings at Delhi, owing to the appointment of a new arbitrator, would shift the ‘jurisdictional seat of arbitration’ from Panchkula in Haryana, the place fixed by the first arbitrator for the arbitration proceedings? Conclusion- Section 42 is to no avail as it does not help the case propounded by the appellant, as in the present case the arbitrator had fixed the jurisdiction...