Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Ramsarup Industries Limited (NCLT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : IA (IB) No.538/KB/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Ramsarup Industries Limited (NCLT Kolkata)

Facts- Ramsarup Industries Limited (Corporate Debtor/Corporate Applicant) had approached the Adjudicating Authority of NCLT u/s 10 of the IBC and was admitted to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (‘CIRP’) on 08.01.2018. The common order dated 07.04.2022 has been passed by the NCLT Bench while deciding three interim applications together filed by various stakeholders in the matter.

A resolution plan was submitted by SS Natural Resources Ltd. (“Successful Resolution Applicant”/ “SRA”) which was approved by the CoC with 74.41% of voting share. Subsequently, the resolution plan was approved by Adjudicating Authority on 04.09.2019. A monitoring agency to oversee the implementation of the successful resolution plan was constituted consisting of 6 members.

The SRA had gone in appeal before the NCLAT stating that NCLT had materially altered its Resolution Plan by imposing additional financial obligations. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and directed the Monitoring Agency to commence the implementation of the Resolution Plan, failing which, an application for liquidation of Corporate Debtor was liable to be moved before NCLT. The SRA went in appeal before the SC challenging the order dated 04.03.2021, nonetheless, the appeal was dismissed stating lack of substantial question of law. Another appeal was filed by Vanguard Credit & Holdings Pvt. Ltd. from same order of NCLAT before SC. During the pendency of the Vanguard’s appeal, the SRA did not take any steps for implementation of the plan and waited for the decision of the SC. Eventually the Vanguard’s appeal was also dismissed by the SC.

The Chairman of the Monitoring Agency had issued a notice dated 17.05.2021 calling for 7th meeting of the Agency on 20.05.2021. In the said meeting the SRA had expressed its willingness to implement the Resolution Plan subject to some conditions; it also declined to give consent for release the upfront payment to meet CIRP cost; and objected to the utilization of performance security until the Vanguard appeal was pending before the Supreme Court. Other members of Monitoring Agency apprised the SRA regarding the need for unconditional implementation of the Resolution Plan and demanded that SRA should compensate the Financial Creditors for delay in implementation of the plan.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031