Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pashupati Nath Tubewells Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pashupati Nath Tubewells Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT held that the agriculture/cultivation includes irrigation or watering of the plants, as due to lack of irrigation, it is very difficult to have any agriculture produce. Accordingly, it was held that the activities carried out by the appellant (Drilling of wells & Tubewells) is covered in the Negative List, which are exempt from Service tax. FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT DELHI ORDER The issue involved in this appeal is whether the services provided by the appellant i.e. digging of bore well, whether the same is exe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031