This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CIT cannot assume section 263 Jurisdiction merely for not agreeing with View of AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Calcutta High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Calcutta High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
PCIT Vs Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Calcutta High Court)
The short issue which falls for consideration is whether the exercise of jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Income Tax-14 (Kolkata) (CIT) under Section 263 of the Act was just and proper. The Tribunal considered the factual position and noted that the CIT was of the opinion that the order of the Assessing Officer dated 18th March, 2013 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue and certain reasons were assigned thereto. The matter concerns the provision and contingencies of Rs.25,57,00,000/- on account of ...
