Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Majhar Muzaffar Hussain Sayed Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Majhar Muzaffar Hussain Sayed Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad) It is seen that all three notices have denied any knowledge of the transaction of presence of cigarettes in the containers. There is no specific primary evidence produced by revenue, except the statements, to establish that the notices were aware of the presence of cigarettes in the container. It was argued by Learned Counsel for Majhar Bhai that they had demanded the cross-examination of witnesses however the same was not allowed. Learned counsel argued that no reliance can be placed on the statements if cross-examination has not...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930