Case Law Details
I.P. Yesudoss Vs Ministry of Finance (Madras High Court)
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents specifically the 5th respondent not to actin excess of its jurisdction pending disposal of the statutory proceedings in violation of the principles of natural justice by seeking claims towards the AY 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 towards the frozen, seized money by way of judicial proceedings,considering the representation dated 10.09.2020
Held: High Court After Taking Cognizance of Delayed Disposal of Appeals under Faceless Appeal Scheme, 2020 Directed Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) On Account of Principles of Natural Justice To Decide Appeal Expeditiously Within 12 Weeks.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT
The petitioner, appearing in person, seeks a mandamus directing the respondents particularly the 5th respondent being the Income Tax Officer, not to act in excess of his jurisdiction pending disposal of statutory proceedings in violation of the principles of natural justice.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
The High Court has directed to Decide Appeal Expeditiously Within 12 Weeks for which the Assessee has to knock the doors of the High Court. What is the time allowed under statute to complete the case under FACELESS APPEAL?