This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
10% disallowance of expenditure towards sub-contract for want of proper bills was justified
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs SPL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
CIT Vs SPL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Conclusion: Since assessee-contractor carried out work for laying down road in a thermal power plant, therefore, there was no question of not incurring of expenditure by assessee to carry on road work contracts but the disallowance of whole expenditure towards sub contract work by AO for want of proper bills was not justified instead disallowance of 10% of expenses made by appellate authorities was justified.
Held: Assessee was a contractor, who carried out the work of road laying in the Thermal Power Plant. AO made a...
Author Info
