This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 54B does not specify that entire land should be used for cultivation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajendra Bastimal Chordiya Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rajendra Bastimal Chordiya Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
The issue in the present ground is with respect to the denial of claim of deduction u/s 54B of the Act for the reason that the land was not cultivable. We find that the reason for denying the claim of deduction u/s 54B of the Act was for the reason that out of the total area of 1 hectare 12R, agricultural activities were carried out on a portion of the land and there was no evidence of crop grown on the balance portion of the land. Before us, it is assessee’s submission that the entire land is one land and the fact that crop was grown in portion...
