This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 54F exemption eligible on Property Purchased in wife’s name
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Rajkumar Mandhani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shri Rajkumar Mandhani Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
In the case before us, the assessee and his wife are independent income tax assessees and the assessee already owned one house at Kilpauk, Chennai. The assessee therefore, cannot be said to have invested in order to avoid capital gains to tax in his hands, as u/s 54F(1), the assessee is entitled to exemption u/s 54F even if he already holds one property in his name. Therefore, the investment by the assessee of the capital gains in purchase or construction of a residential house at Alagappa Nagar, Chennai in the name of his wife w...
Similar case is going on in regard to Benami Properties Act before DGIT and also pending before Hon’ble Calcutta Highcourt-Ref Case-32118/2014,order dated16th june,2015 passed by Dr.Sambuddha Chakraborty,Hon,ble judge.Another same case pending before the judge case no-FA 184 OF 2017 WITH CAN 12045/2017.
Also pending before 5th court Jr.Division-Civil judges court Howrah-Title suite-9328/2014 and 6220/2014 in regard to illegal mutation,illegal construction and Mis use of Ad interim injunction.
Kindly check .All properties are obtained benami name and muated by Block land and reforms department -Govt of W.B ALONG WITH ORDER OF DEMOLITION ILLEGAL PART BY HOWRAH ZILLA PARISHAD FROM 2012 ON WARDS.