This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice issued in the name of a dead person is unenforceable despite non-intimation of death
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Alamelu Veerappan Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Alamelu Veerappan Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
Admittedly, the limitation period for issuance of notice for reopening expired on 31.3.2017. The impugned notice was issued on 30.3.2017 in the name of the dead person. On being intimated about the death, the Department sent the notice to the petitioner – his spouse to participate in the proceedings. This notice was well beyond the period of limitation, as it has been issued after 31.3.2017. If we approach the problem sans complicated facts, a notice issued beyond the period of limitation i.e. 31.3.2017 is a nullity, unenforce...





