This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Settlement commission order holding that assessee had misrepresented facts without an enquiry into the matter is invalid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dr. Prathap Chandra Reddy Vs Income Tax Settlement Commission Additional Bench (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Dr. Prathap Chandra Reddy Vs Income Tax Settlement Commission (Madras High Court)
Settlement Commission did not conduct an enquiry to satisfy itself that the stand taken by the PCIT by way of a supplementary report could be a valid ground to come to a conclusion that the assessee had made a false claim on the refund due. The Settlement Commission did not endeavor to go into the aspect as to why this information was not placed by the PCIT while filing the report dated 05.02.2018 under Section 245D(2B) of the Act. Thus, to hold that the assessee had misrepresented facts without an enqui...
