Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajkamal R. Bajaj v/s ADDL. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
CA Prarthana Jalan Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT has in the case of Mr. Rajkamal R. Bajaj v/s ACIT has held that Reimbursement of a medical expense is not perquisite u/s 17(2) of the Act. Brief facts of the case are that The assessee received a sum of Rs.90,090/- towards reimbursement of medical expenses from the company M/s Bajaj Consultants Pvt. Ltd., wherein, he is a Director and claimed the same as exempt u/s 17(2) of the Act. The ld. Assessing Officer in view of section 17(2)(vi) brought to tax by treating it as perquisite under the head income from salary and taxed accordingly. The Ld CIT(...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Rockey says:

    please tell me the treatment of Medical Allowance received by employee, whether it is exempt if yes then upto what extent, and whether employee required to furnished bill???

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031