This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Pursuing law & practicing law are two different things -SC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Archana Girish Sabnis Vs Bar Council Of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pursuing law and practicing law are two different things : Bar Council not bound to grant licence to practice law: SC
The case of the appellant in brief is that after completion of professional course i.e. Licentiate of the Court of Examiners in Homoeopathy medicines (LCEH), she took admission to LL.B. course conducted by University of Mumbai. It is submitted by the appellant that LCEH is considered as equivalent to graduation degree by the Central Council of Homoeopathy and such decision is even approved by the Government of India for equating the pay scales.
The University of Mumbai admitted...
DECISION IS ABSOLUTILY FAVOURING ADVOCATES COMMUNITY.BUT WHAT ABOUT TAX ADVOCATES.WHOES BASIC RIGHT TO PRACTICE ANY LAW INCLUDING INCOME TAX,SALES TAX,GST ARE DOMINATED ONLY BY CA’S BCI MUST TAKE STEPS TO SAFEGUARD THIER MEMBERS BASIC RIGHTS. AS ICAI HAS DONE IN HISTORY.