This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) not justified based on mere high stamp duty valuation of property
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- The Income Tax Officer Vs. Shri Ajay Sharma (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010- 2011
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs. Shri Ajay Sharma (ITAT Delhi)
Where assessee had offered actual amount received on sale of property for taxation, revenue authorities were not justified in passing penalty order under section 271(1)(c) by adopting higher sale consideration under section 50C on basis of stamp duty valuation of said property.
The assessee has disclosed all the relevant facts of sale of the property to the Revenue Department. The assessee declared the sale consideration of Rs. 1,27,50,000 as per sale deed and also offered the short term capital gain for taxation. The A.O. however, applied the deeming prov...




