Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/S Kanika Swami Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 clearly prove that the sufficient checks have been imposed upon the secured creditor while proceeding with the possession and sale of the secured assets of the borrower. When the action of the secured creditor is challenged by the borrower under Section 17 (1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the secured creditor is required to prove the compliance of all the mandatory provisions of the Act and the Rule before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. If any of the requirements of Act and the Rule is not found to be complied by the Debt Recove...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930