Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Palogix Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. ICICI Bank Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Company Appeal (AT) (InsoL) No. 30 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Persons Authorised to file Applications under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code [IBC] in National Company Law Tribunal [NCLT]

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal [NCLAT] Judgment dated Sept. 20, 2017 wherein it has been held that a Power of Attorney [POA] Holder is not authorised to file proceedings under IBC and only an ‘Authorised Representative’ by the Board of Directors can file the same.

Background:

ICICI Bank had initiated CIRP against M/s Palogix, the Corporate Debtor for default in honouring its debt obligations. NCLT vide order dated May 16, 2017 accepted the application and appointed an IRP. The Corporate Debtor, M/s Palogix had not raised any dispute with respect to the existence of debt and default on their part.

The issue which was raised by the M/s Palogix that person initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] was authorised by a Board Resolution of 2002 and 2009, which was much before the IBC was enacted.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031