This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deposit in bank not explained satisfactorily is unexplained credit U/s. 69A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Parbat M. Chamriya Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009- 10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
The assessee has failed to bring on record any evidence to establish his claims that the deposits in the ICICI Bank, saving bank account at Khar (W), Mumbai was out of receipts connected with his business transactions. In our view the assessee has failed to controvert the findings of the authorities below that he was not engaged in any business activity during the year under consideration. Therefore, in our considered opinion, the said unexplained deposits amounting to Rs. 27,10,812/-, the source of which has not been satisfactorily explained by the assessee, has been correctly treated as unex...




