Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

S. 245D Settlement Commission can decide application on the basis of a summary inquiry

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2013 taxguru.in 445
Case Name
Vishnubhai Mafatlal Patel Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & 1 (Gujarat High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT

Vishnubhai Mafatlal Patel

Versus

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Special Civil Application Nos. 12060, 12061 & 12063 of 2012

DECEMBER  4, 2012 

JUDGMENT

Akil Kureshi, J.

These petitions arise out of common background. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. For the purpose of this order, we may notice the facts as arising in Special Civil Application No. 12060/2012.

2.1 The petitioner is an individual and is assessed to tax as such. The petitioner claims to be engaged in the business of infrastructure development activities. On 5.10.2010, search operations were carried out at the residential and business premises of the petitioner under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short) . The petitioner made disclosure of income of Rs. 48 crores in his statements which were recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. The proceedings under section 153A of the Act for assessment year 2008-2009 to 2010-2011 and under section 143(2) of the Act for the assessment year 2011-2012 were pending. On 28.5.2012, the petitioner filed an application under section 245C of the Act before Settlement Commission for the assessment years 2008-2009 to 2011-2012. The petitioner disclosed additional income of Rs.49,24,14,630/- for different years in the following manner :

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.