Case Law Details
In our order in AAR No. 1009 of 2010 (SEPCO III Electric Power Corporation), we had taken the view that if the applicant before this Authority had already filed a return of income involving the amount arising out of the identical transaction on which a question for our ruling is raised by filing an application under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, the application before the Authority for Advance Rulings will be barred by the clause (i) of the proviso to section 245R(2) of the Act and the application will have to be rejected. On an application made by the applicant therein before this Authority to review or reconsider the correctness of that view, after considering the relevant aspects pointed out, this Authority again reiterated its view. The correctness of this view so taken is again sought to be canvassed in this Application and the other Applications heard along with it containing similar fact situation.
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) NEW DELHI
2nd Day of February, 2012
A.A.R. No. 955 of 2010
Applicant- Net App B.V.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
