Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs 1. The Union of India 2. The Commissioner of Central Excise [Bombay High Court]
Appeal Number : WP No.2308 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The Tribunal, first and foremost, is duty bound by Article 141 of the Constitution of India to ensure that it follows binding precedent of the Supreme Court. The Tribunal as a judicial body must follow principles of consistency when it decides cases. The lack of consistency is clear on the face of record. Judicial orders must be passed by the Tribunal with a greater degree of circumspection and application of mind. Whim and caprice are alien to the judicial process. Consistency, based on judicial precedents should be the norm.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 2308 of 2009

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031