Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Company Law

Calcutta HC Stays SFIO Probe Into Alleged Misuse of HNGIL Provident Fund Trust

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 14014
Case Name
Sanjay Somany And Ors. Vs Hindusthan National Glass And Industries Limited (HNGIL) And Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Sanjay Somany And Ors. Vs Hindusthan National Glass And Industries Limited (HNGIL) And Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

Calcutta High Court Stays SFIO Probe Into Alleged Misuse Of HNGIL Exempted Employees’ Provident Fund Trust

Summary: The Calcutta High Court considered three appeals arising from a common judgment and order dated 3 August 2026 by which the learned Single Judge had extended an ex parte ad interim injunction dated 16 June 2026, dismissed two applications seeking vacation of that injunction, and invited affidavits in the pending injunction petition. APO/56/2026 was filed by defendant nos. 2, 3 and 4, APO/57/2026 by defendant nos. 5 to 8, and APO/58/2026 by defendant no. 1. The underlying suit was one for recovery of money, with the first two prayers seeking sums exceeding Rs.20 crores and Rs.35 lakhs respectively.

The plaintiff company had undergone a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and the allegations in the suit concerned alleged defalcations relating to the funds of an Exempted Employees Provident Fund Trust. The appellants raised several objections, including that the plaintiff company and the Provident Fund Trust were separate legal entities; that the Trust was not an entity under the Companies Act, 2013 capable of being investigated by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO); that the requirements for an ex parte injunction had not been met; that SFIO investigation had been directed without a pleading or prayer to that effect; that material facts had allegedly been suppressed; and that Section 94 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 had been incorrectly invoked.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,191

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.