Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Raipur ITAT Restricts Section 272A(2)(e) Penalty to Section 139(4) Filing Period

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13385
Case Name
Bethany Seva Sangam Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Bethany Seva Sangam Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)

Summary: The appeal concerned penalty under section 272A(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for failure by Bethany Seva Sangam, a trust running Bethany College & Nursing, to furnish its return of income for A.Y. 2012-13. The assessee had not filed the return by 30.09.2012. The assessment was subsequently reopened under section 147 and notice under section 148 was issued on 30.03.2019. The assessee filed a return on 24.07.2019 declaring Nil income, but the return was treated as invalid on the e-filing portal because ITR-V/e-verification was pending. The assessment was completed at Nil income. The Assessing Officer later levied penalty of Rs.2,55,800/- under section 272A(2)(e), calculated at Rs.100/- per day for 2,558 days. The CIT(Appeals) confirmed the penalty, rejecting the assessee’s explanation that its office bearers were priests/saints and teachers who were not familiar with the Income-tax Act and had believed that registration under section 12A and application of income to charitable activities meant that no return was required. The CIT(A) also rejected the plea of reasonable cause under section 273B.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee relied on its registration under section 12A, its subsequent filing conduct and several Tribunal and High Court decisions concerning reasonable cause. It also raised an alternative contention that penalty could not continue after expiry of the period during which a valid belated return could be furnished. The Tribunal did not accept the plea that the omission was a bona fide consequence of ignorance of the law. It noted that the trust had obtained registration under section 12A in 2001 and had filed returns for subsequent years, including A.Y. 2013-14 and A.Y. 2014-15, which the Tribunal considered inconsistent with the asserted lack of awareness. The Tribunal distinguished Akali Baba Phool Singh Educational Trust, Shyam Gopal Charitable Trust, Karandhai Tamil Sangam and HTSL Community Service Trust on their facts.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,834

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.