Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Section 7 IBC Plea Time-Barred as Unsupported Default Date Cannot Extend Limitation: NCLAT

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 11270
Case Name
Shree Dhanvantari Pharmaceuticals Vs Konkan Ayur Pharma Private Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLAT
Advertisement

Shree Dhanvantari Pharmaceuticals Vs Konkan Ayur Pharma Private Limited (NCLAT Delhi)

Summary: The appeal challenged the NCLT-IV, Mumbai Bench order dated 07.02.2024 dismissing the appellant’s Section 7 IBC application seeking initiation of CIRP against Konkan Ayur Pharma Private Limited. The appellant claimed that loans aggregating to ₹2,26,45,568/- had been advanced to the Corporate Debtor and that ₹3,55,54,900/- including interest at 18% per annum was due. The NCLT had found uncertainty regarding the date of default, the nature of the transaction and the authority to institute the proceedings. Before the NCLAT, the appellant contended that the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged the debt, that the date of default had been amended to 30.05.2022, and that the Section 7 petition had been authorised by two of the three surviving partners. The Corporate Debtor disputed the existence of a financial debt and the date of default, while the intervening respondents questioned the authority of the majority partners. NCLAT held that the majority decision of two of the three surviving partners was sufficient to authorise institution of the Section 7 proceedings. It further held that the amounts advanced constituted debt despite the absence of a formal loan agreement and that interest was not essential for a debt to constitute financial debt. However, the Tribunal found that the last transaction was on 31.03.2019 and that the subsequently stated default date of 30.05.2022 was unsupported. Since the Section 7 petition filed in August 2022 was beyond the applicable limitation period reckoned from 31.03.2019, the appeal was dismissed.

Background and Section 7 Proceedings

The appellant is a partnership firm engaged in the development, manufacture and trading of Ayurvedic medicines. The Corporate Debtor was incorporated on 27.08.2008 under an AYUSH cluster initiative promoted by the Government of India.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,910

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.