Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Rental Income From Unused Premises Doesn’t Bar Section 12AB Renewal: ITAT Delhi

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 10178
Case Name
Nai Disha Education Society Vs CIT Exemptions (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
N. A
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Nai Disha Education Society Vs CIT Exemptions (ITAT Delhi)

The appeal arose from the order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh, refusing renewal of registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a society predominantly engaged in imparting education and registered with the District Registrar of Societies, Rohtak, had applied for registration under Section 12AB by filing Form No. 10AB on 27.09.2025. During verification, the CIT(E) noted that the assessee had earned rental income and sought an explanation as to how such income was incidental to its charitable activities. The assessee explained that its unused premises had been leased to Global Security Solutions Private Limited for conducting a residential skill development programme under the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana (DDU-GKY) of the Government of India. It submitted that the rental income was applied towards its educational objects, was not business income, and that the premises were rented only to utilise unused space efficiently. The tenant also used the premises for educational purposes. The assessee relied on judicial precedents supporting the proposition that letting out property for efficient utilisation does not disentitle a charitable institution from exemption or registration.

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had placed on record its provisional registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(i), its earlier registration under Section 12AA, the lease deed, financial statements, and the Memorandum of Association. It observed that the assessee’s predominant object was education, which falls within the definition of “charitable purpose” under Section 2(15), and that the genuineness of its educational activities had never been questioned by the CIT(E). The only objection was that rental income from the unused portion of the premises amounted to commercial exploitation.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,891

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.