Kimaya Buildtech LLP Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order dated 09.02.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon, arising from an assessment order dated 09.05.2022 under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2021-22. The assessee, a limited liability partnership engaged in real estate development and sale, had filed its return declaring total income of ₹1,32,05,340.
The assessment originated from information received following a search conducted under Section 132 in the case of M/s. Blomstrende Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Group. During the search, digital data and WhatsApp chats were seized from Shri Amit Chauhan, allegedly relating to the sale of property situated at W-15, GK-1, Delhi, and certain loan transactions. The Assessing Officer alleged that although the registered sale deed reflected consideration of ₹9 crore, the actual sale consideration was ₹13.50 crore, with ₹4 crore allegedly received in cash. The Assessing Officer also referred to WhatsApp chats indicating an alleged accommodation loan entry of ₹20 lakh. The assessee denied receiving any cash consideration or accommodation entry, maintained that the property had been sold for ₹9 crore through a registered sale deed, and disputed the allegations. Nevertheless, the Assessing Officer added ₹4 crore to the assessee’s income, which was subsequently confirmed by the CIT(A).
Want to Read the Complete Judgment?
You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.
Already subscribed? Log in
One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.
