Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Upholds Denial of Section 10(38) Exemption on SRK Industries Shares

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 9390
Case Name
Pankaj Agarwal & Sons (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement

Pankaj Agarwal & Sons (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

The ITAT Chennai disposed of eight connected appeals involving identical issues for Assessment Year 2014-15 arising from orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The principal dispute related to the denial of exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act on long-term capital gains arising from the purchase and sale of equity shares of M/s. SRK Industries Ltd. The Assessing Officer had treated the transactions as sham and added the gains as unexplained cash credits under Section 68. The appeals also involved issues relating to computation of total income, incorrect computation of sale consideration in certain cases, denial of set-off of losses in one appeal, and levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C. The Tribunal heard all appeals together and disposed of them by a common order.

The Assessing Officer, while completing the assessments under Section 143(3), concluded that the transactions in the shares of M/s. SRK Industries Ltd. were not genuine. The assessment relied upon findings of the Investigation Wing and SEBI, according to which the company lacked credibility, trading in its shares was manipulated through a syndicate of brokers and broking entities, and beneficiaries sold the shares after the prices had been artificially increased to claim exemption under Section 10(38). The Assessing Officer further recorded that brokers facilitating such transactions generally received commission in cash and that the price manipulation enabled beneficiaries to convert unaccounted money into exempt long-term capital gains. Relying on these findings and judicial precedents, the Assessing Officer rejected the exemption claimed under Section 10(38) and treated the gains as unexplained cash credits under Section 68.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,661

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.