This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Deletes Section 271D Penalty as AO Failed to Record Satisfaction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Bapu Reddy Jala (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Bapu Reddy Jala (ITAT Hyderabad)
The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2019-20, which had deleted a penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act. The dispute arose from the receipt of ₹75 lakh in cash by the assessee as advance sale consideration for land from the Managing Partner of Bharat Engineering Enterprises. The cash was recovered by the police during investigation of a theft and, during assessment, the Assessing Officer treated the amount as unexplained income under Section 69A read ...






