Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Deletes Section 271D Penalty as AO Failed to Record Satisfaction

Case Law Details

Case Name
ACIT Vs Bapu Reddy Jala (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20
Advertisement ACIT Vs Bapu Reddy Jala (ITAT Hyderabad) The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2019-20, which had deleted a penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act. The dispute arose from the receipt of ₹75 lakh in cash by the assessee as advance sale consideration for land from the Managing Partner of Bharat Engineering Enterprises. The cash was recovered by the police during investigation of a theft and, during assessment, the Assessing Officer treated the amount as unexplained income under Section 69A read ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,551

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *