This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 153C Notices Quashed as Satisfaction Note Was Recorded Nearly 10 Months Late
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajib Mukhopadhyay Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Rajib Mukhopadhyay Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Core Issue: The principal issue before the Bombay High Court was whether proceedings initiated under section 153C were valid where the satisfaction note of the Assessing Officer of the searched person was recorded nearly ten months after completion of the assessment of the searched person. The Court examined whether the requirement laid down by the Supreme Court in Calcutta Knitwears that the satisfaction note be recorded “immediately” after completion of the searched person’s assessment constitutes a man...






