This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Upholds Addition as Unsupported Gold Deposit Agreements Failed to Explain Excess Stock
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smapath Raj Sunil Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2020-21
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Smapath Raj Sunil Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad, dismissed the assessee’s appeal and upheld the addition of ₹3.75 crore made on account of unexplained excess stock of gold found during a survey under Section 133A of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that unsupported gold deposit agreements produced after the survey, along with subsequent payment of interest to alleged depositors, were insufficient to explain the excess stock discovered during the survey.
The assessee, proprietor of a jewellery business, was ...
Author Info
