This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69 Addition Deleted as Seized Loose Sheet Lacked Corroborative Evidence
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Rutuja Projects (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Rutuja Projects (ITAT Hyderabad)
Revenue’s Appeal Dismissed Because No Evidence Proved On-Money Payment for Property Purchase; Section 69 Addition Set Aside Because Registered Sale Deeds Were Not Disproved by Independent Evidence; Unexplained Investment Addition Deleted Because Same Seized Document Was Already Held to Be a Dumb Document; ITAT Upholds Deletion of On-Money Addition Because Revenue Produced No Independent Material; Property Purchase Addition Deleted Because Seized Paper Could Not Override Registered Documents; ITAT Affirms Relief Because Alleged On-...
Author Info
