Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Naresh Bhavanji Chheda Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Naresh Bhavanji Chheda Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Deletes Section 69A Additions Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence; No Section 69A Addition Without Physical Cash Found During Search: ITAT; ITAT Rejects Additions Based Solely on Third-Party Search Material; Denial of Cross-Examination Makes Tax Addition Unsustainable: ITAT Mumbai; Uncorroborated Mobile Phone Entries Cannot Support Tax Addition: ITAT; ITAT Holds Presumption Under Sections 132(4A) and 292C Limited to Document Holder; Section 69A Cannot Apply to Alleged Receipts Not Physically Found: ITAT In the case of Naresh Bhavanji Chheda V...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031