Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinay Indersing Dhupia Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinay Indersing Dhupia Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) The Surat ITAT held that section 56(2)(x) applies to “any immovable property”, and therefore even agricultural land falls within its ambit. The assessee had argued that the land purchased was agricultural land and not a “capital asset”, and hence outside the scope of section 56(2)(x). Rejecting the contention, the Tribunal clarified that the concept of “capital asset” is relevant in the seller’s hands for capital gains taxation, but not in the buyer’s hands for section 56(2)(x). The assessee had purchased agricultural land along with c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031