Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd Athar Anjum Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohd Athar Anjum Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Reopening u/s 148 beyond six years from end of AY 2016–17 held time-barred; notice and consequent assessment quashed in view of limitation under proviso to Section 149 as clarified in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. Core Issue: Whether a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2016–17 after expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year is barred by limitation in view of the first proviso to Section 149(1), and whether such time-barred cases can be reopened under the new reassessment regime. Read SC ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Deletes Section 14A Disallowance Because No Exempt Income Was Earned Natural Justice Violated as Assessee’s Explanations Were Not Properly Examined Before Reopening IT Department’s Order Quashed as Giving Effect Order Was Passed Beyond Section 153(5) Time Limit Section 127 & 263 Orders Quashed as Assessee Was Denied Fair Hearing During COVID Kerala HC Condones 676-Day ITAT Appeal Delay Due to Auditor Lapse View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930