Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalur Basappa Shivaprakash Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kalur Basappa Shivaprakash Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Ad-hoc Estimation of Agricultural Income Rejected: ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition The assessee declared ₹50 lakh as agricultural income, which the AO partly disbelieved due to lack of bills, inconsistencies in crop details, and alleged improbabilities. The AO estimated income at ₹1 lakh per acre and treated the balance ₹15.55 lakh as unexplained income under Section 69A, alleging it to be a colourable device. The CIT(A) upheld the addition citing absence of supporting evidence as required under Rule 2 of Part IV of Schedule I. The ITA...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930