CESTAT Upholds Excise Rule 25 Penalty Despite No Fraud; Allows Appropriation of Duty Already Paid
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

CESTAT Upholds Excise Rule 25 Penalty Despite No Fraud; Allows Appropriation of Duty Already Paid

Case Law Details

Case Name
Little Star Foods Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal - GST (CESTAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Little Star Foods Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal – GST (CESTAT Hyderabad) In Little Star Foods Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Tax, Medchal, the CESTAT Hyderabad examined the limited issue of imposition of penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, along with appropriation of duty and interest already paid by the appellant. The appellant was engaged in manufacturing “Cadbury Perk with Glucose Energy” on a job work basis for another company and received conversion charges. A dispute arose regarding the classification of the product, with the department...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,290

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *