Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reassessment Beyond 10-Year Limit Invalid: Gujarat HC Quashes Notice for AY 2012-13

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 3992
Case Name
Jignesh Ramniklal Doshi Vs DCIT (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Jignesh Ramniklal Doshi Vs DCIT (Gujarat High Court)

The Gujarat High Court examined a writ petition challenging the validity of a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 and the consequent assessment order passed under Sections 147 read with 143(3) for Assessment Year (AY) 2012–13. The petitioner, engaged in real estate and financing, had originally filed a return of income for AY 2012–13 on 28.09.2012 and later revised it on 19.03.2014. The return was accepted under scrutiny assessment by an order dated 12.03.2015. A subsequent reassessment was carried out in 2019.

On 11.11.2022, a search and seizure operation was conducted by the Investigation Wing in connection with another group, during which documents relating to the petitioner were found and statements were recorded. Based on the seized material, a notice under Section 148 was issued on 31.03.2023 initiating reassessment proceedings. Multiple notices under Section 142(1) followed, and the petitioner submitted replies and documents. A show cause notice proposing additions was issued, to which the petitioner responded. However, without considering the reply, the Assessing Officer passed an order on 18.05.2025 determining higher income by making additions for unexplained expenditure and undisclosed income.

The petitioner challenged the reassessment primarily on the ground of limitation. It was contended that AY 2012–13 fell prior to 01.04.2021, when amendments to reassessment provisions came into force. Therefore, the proviso to Section 149(1) applied, which restricts reopening beyond the prescribed time limits under the earlier regime. The petitioner argued that since the reassessment was based on search proceedings, the provisions of Sections 153A and 153C were relevant, and the limitation period must be computed accordingly. Relying on a prior judgment of the same Court dated 05.01.2026, it was submitted that the outer limit of ten years must be calculated from the end of the assessment year relevant to the year of search.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,605

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.