This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Orders Reconsideration of Excise Duty on Barbed Wire Due to Incomplete Findings
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Nataraja Industries (CESTAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Nataraja Industries (CESTAT Bangalore)
The appeal before CESTAT Bangalore concerned whether the conversion of GI wire into barbed wire and chain link mesh constitutes “manufacture” under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and whether such goods qualify as branded goods, thereby affecting eligibility for SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE.
The respondent, a partnership firm, was engaged in manufacturing barbed wire and related products using GI wire purchased from an authorized distributor of Tata Wiron, a product of ...




