Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satya @ Subendy Majumdar Vs Special Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : SAFEMA
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satya @ Subendy Majumdar Vs Special Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi) SAFEMA Tribunal: FERA Penalty Cannot Be Sustained Without Evidence Of Role In Hawala Transaction The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA allowed the appeal filed by Satya @ Subendy Majumdar and set aside the penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973. The case arose from investigations into a hawala network linked to cross-border transactions between India, Bangladesh, and Singapore, where funds generated through alleged over-invoicing of tea exports were transferred abroad through info...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930