Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Raj Diamonds (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Raj Diamonds (ITAT Bangalore) Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – Suspicion from STR Report Insufficient When Purchases Supported by Evidence The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the business of gold and diamond jewellery, filed its return for AY 2018-19 declaring income of ₹92.24 lakh. Based on a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) alleging that certain suppliers were accommodation entry providers, the AO reopened the assessment and treated purchases of ₹2.49 crore from two entities as bogus, adding the entire amount to income u/s 147. Before the CIT(A), the assessee pr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031