Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Deleted Because Addition Was Based on Estimated Bogus Purchases

Case Law Details

Case Name
ITO Vs In Coach Builders (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2009-10
Advertisement
ITO Vs In Coach Builders (ITAT Mumbai) In ITO vs In Coach Builders, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act cannot be levied when the quantum addition itself is made purely on an estimated basis. The assessee’s reassessment was initiated based on information alleging bogus purchases, and the Assessing Officer added 20% of such purchases under Section 69 as unexplained expenditure. The addition was upheld by the CIT(A) but later reduced to 15% by the Tribunal in quantum proceedings, reflecting its estimated nature. Despite this, the AO...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: AJAY K AGRAWAL AND ASSOCIATES
Location: NEW DELHI, Delhi
Articles Published: 260

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *