Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Company Law

Contract Termination not triggered by insolvency is not barred by moratorium u/s. 14 of IBC: NCLAT Delhi

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pradeep Upadhyay Vs Bhadohi Industrial Development Authority (BIDA) (NCLAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLAT
Advertisement
Pradeep Upadhyay Vs Bhadohi Industrial Development Authority (BIDA) (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT Delhi held that termination of contract not triggered by the insolvency of Corporate Debtor and therefore not barred by moratorium under section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC]. Accordingly, appeal held as devoid of merit. Facts- The present Appeal has been filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) against the impugned order dated 06.06.2025 of Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal. The Appellant seeks to set aside or modify the order dated June 6, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *