Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishore Anand Shetty Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kishore Anand Shetty Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee challenged (i) addition u/s 50C based on higher stamp duty value and (ii) denial of exemption u/s 54F on reinvestment in a residential flat. The Tribunal noted that the original stamp valuation was wrongly inflated due to inclusion of an approach road area and was later rectified through a supplementary deed, reducing valuation below declared sale consideration. Hence, invocation of sec.50C failed and addition of ₹13.47 lakh was deleted. Regarding sec.54F, the AO denied exemption since the agreement for purchase of the new flat was date...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031